7/03/2012

‘S Contractions


Contractions can be confusing for English learners, because they aren’t always sure what the contracted word represents. In a previous post, we saw how confusing the ‘d contraction is. It could be had or would. The ‘s contraction can be even more confusing. Sometimes it is is (but never was), has or the genitive form of of. Like with ‘d, we can distinguish what ‘s is in context.

Look at the following sentences and see if you can distinguish the difference.

1) He’s got some free time.
2) She’s late as usual.
3) Did you hear that Sarah’s brother got married.
4) What’s your problem?
5) Tomorrow is Mother's Day.6) My mother’s watching a soap opera.
7) Tom’s been running around all day.
8) I walked down the city’s empty streets.
9) Their dog’s fed twice a day.
10) The athlete’s injured his foot.

What helps us distinguish what comes after ‘s is the word that comes after.

Looking at the sentences above, we know when 's is is because after the verb be, we tend to have…
an adjective (2).
noun that describes the subject (4).
a gerund in the continuous tenses (6).
a past participle in the passive voice (9).

You can only contract have when it is used as an auxiliary verb in the present perfect, so we know when ‘s is has before a past participle (1,7,10).

On the other hand, we only use a genitive to show that another object belongs to the noun it is connected to (3,5,8).

Sometimes, you can also distinguish the ‘s by the word it is connected to. We can only contract the verb be and have to a subject but never an object noun. We can attach a genitive to subject noun (3or an object noun (5,8), but never to a pronoun.

Whenever you see the subject pronoun contractions he’s, she’s or it’s, the ‘s can be has (1) or is (2). Instead of adding a genitive to subject pronouns, we have possessive adjectives: his, her, its. Unfortunately, since its and it’s are homophones (same sound, different spelling), they are often confused when written.


Well, I hope this post's explanation's been easy to understand!

No comments: